Communication at the intersection of environment, health, and inequality (2022)
Chris Skurka, Helen Joo, Rainer Romero-Canyas
It should come as no surprise that air pollution is bad for public health and well-being. Globally, air pollution accounts for over 6 million premature deaths related to heart disease, stroke, lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In recent years, environmental non-profit organizations, such as the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), have turned their attention to this issue. Their hope is to develop outreach messaging strategies that can raise awareness of racial disparities linked to air pollution and enhance support for clear air solutions. But communicating about racial disparities to stakeholders is easier said than done. How can practitioners most strategically communicate about the racially disparate impacts of air pollution to engage all relevant publics? This study aims to address this question in our research, which will experimentally compare two different message frames about air pollution impacts.
- Research Journal Health Communication: Who is willing to learn about inequality? Predictors of choice exposure to messaging about racial disparities in air pollution effects among Black and white U.S. residents
- Blog Post Page Center Blog: Walking a tightrope: The effects of environmental advocacy messaging about racial disparities
- Blog Post Page Center Blog: Communication at the intersection of environment, health, and inequality: The case of public messaging from the Environmental Defense Fund